March 27, 2007

KiM Info Newsletter 27-03-07

Ahtisaari recommends supervised independence for Kosovo

27 March 2007 | 09:39 | Source: B92 
NEW YORK, BELGRADE -- Martti Ahtisaari has recommended to the UN Security Council Monday to proclaim supervised independence for Kosovo.

Letter of President Ahtisaari to UN Sec General on Kosovo status

Final version of the President Ahtisaari's Proposal on Kosovo
http://www.unosek.org/docref/Comprehensive_proposal-english.pdf

Nadgledana nezavisnostAccording to UN special Kosovo envoy Martti Ahtisaari, the international community should “supervise Kosovo in the initial stage of its partition from Serbia.”

He also said in his report “it would be impossible for Kosovo to remain an integral part of Serbia,” adding that the manner of granting Kosovo its statehood would not set a precedent for the settlement of other potentially similar cases in the world.

Soon after Ahtisaari’s plan was made known, messages of support followed from the U.S. State Department, the UK, the European Union and NATO, while Russia refused to back the plan, as it still insists on the continuation of the talks.

U.S. Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns expected consultations, rather than new negotiations, to take place between Priština, Belgrade and the UN Security Council in order to formulate “the best resolution for Kosovo’s status settlement.”

Burns reiterated U.S. support to Ahtisaari’s proposal to set Kosovo on the path to independence, pledging to assure minority rights for Kosovo Serbs.

Savet bezbednosti UN“We support all recommendations by Martti Ahtisaari and back the process that will lead to the supervised independence for Kosovo. We are fully aware of the complexity of the task and emotions it entails. However, it’s high time Kosovo residents were given a chance to assume control of their own fate after eight years of suspense,” Burns said.

In a telephone conversation, President Boris Tadić told Burns he disagreed with U.S. State Department’s decision to support Ahtisaari’s plan.

Tadić’s advisor Vuk Jeremić said that the President planned to dispatch official letters to the UN Security Council non-permanent member states.

“We have also planned to send emissaries to the states’ capitals so as to relay Serbia’s position on Kosovo, insisting that the potential for negotiations has not yet been exhausted. We hope this opinion will prevail in the UN Security State,” Jeremić concluded.


Serbia rejects Ahtisaari’s proposal for status of Kosovo-Metohija

Belgrade, March 27, 2007, Belgrade Government

Director of the Serbian government’s Office of Media Relations Srdjan Djuric said last night, that Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica told US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns in telephone talks that Serbia has rejected the proposal presented by UN Special Envoy Marti Ahtisaari for the future status of Kosovo-Metohija. The proposal is in absolute violation of the UN Charter, the Serbian Constitution and international law, and represents solely the interests of the ethnic-Albanian side, said Kostunica.
 
Djuric told the news agency Tanjug that Kostunica particularly stressed that he is convinced that the UN Security Council will not uphold Ahtisaari’s plan, which envisages internationally monitored independence for the southern Serbian province, and following that new, actual negotiations will begin with a new international mediator.


Kostunica: Russian veto in UN SC of historical importance for Serbia

Vojislav Koštunica (FoNet)Belgrade, March 27, 2007, Belgrade Government – Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica said today that the Russian pledge to veto Ahtisaari’s plan regarding the future status of Kosovo-Metohija is of historical importance for Serbia and the Serbian nation.

In a statement to the news agency Tanjug, Kostunica stressed that the Russian veto in the UN Security Council, on UN Special Envoy Marti Ahtisaari’s plan for the status of Kosovo-Metohija which implies breaking up Serbia and changing its borders at will, is in the deepest sense of historical importance for Serbia and the Serbian nation.

Today Serbia once again declares that Kosovo-Metohija will never be independent, and that Serbia rejects in advance any attempt at seizing Kosovo-Metohija as an act of legal aggression, said the Serbian Prime Minister.

He recalled that the NATO took military action against Serbia without the approval of the UN Security Council and being responsible for that is a burden large enough for the NATO to carry for the past and entire present century.

We are convinced that Ahtisaari’s proposal will not be upheld by the Security Council and that will open the doors to a new process of negotiations with a new mediator, stressed Kostunica.


Speech of Serbian prime Minister Kostunica at talks in Veinna, March 10, 2007


Tadić: Independence is unacceptable

26 March 2007 | 19:44 | Source: B92 
BERLIN, BELGRADE -- President Boris Tadić said Serbia strongly disagreed with the State Department’s decision to back Ahtisaari’s Kosovo plan.

Boris Tadić (Beta)“Any form of independence for Kosovo-Metohija is unacceptable for Serbia, and we will strive to express the need to reach a compromise solution through continued negotiations in our contacts with the UN Security Council member states,” Tadić told U.S. Under secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns in a telephone conversation.

Tadić said he saw “room for further dialogue”, as well as that the UN special Kosovo envoy Martti Ahtisaari had “not yet exhausted all potential for negotiations”, the president’s press office said in a statement issued today.

“Serbia is ready to take a constructive part in further talks,” Tadić said, stressing it was “vitally important to do all in order to ensure peace and stability in Kosovo.”

Tadić said that was “for the most part NATO’s responsibility”, adding that Serbia was ready to help maintain peace and stability in the province.

Rašković-Ivić: U.S. backs ethnic cleansing

Meanwhile, Kosovo Coordinating Center chairwoman Sanda Rašković-Ivić said she believed the proposal for Kosovo’s supervised independence, “announced by U.S. Under Secretary for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns”, would not be adopted and that negotiations would resume, the government reported on its web site.

Rašković-Ivić said Burns’ statement expressing the United States’ full support for Ahtisaari’s Kosovo status plan was tantamount to the U.S. backing of “ethnic cleansing and the seizure of territory of a sovereign, internationally recognized state, member and founder of the UN.”

She pointed out that “the U.S. backs the creation of another Albanian state in the Balkans on someone else’s territory, which would be built on the most brutal ethnic cleansing that started at the end of the 20th century and continues in the 21st century.”

Rašković-Ivić repeated that the resumption of talks was “the only way to find a compromise that would satisfy both sides.”

Minister: UN will reject Ahtisaari plan

Minister of public administration and local self-government Zoran Lončar said today that he was “convinced the UN Security Council will reject the proposal of the UN Special Envoy Martti Ahtisaari since it is directly opposed to the UN Charter,” the government web site said.

Tanjug reported Lončar as saying the proposal was in fact “a plan which meets the interests of separatists to let the ethnic Albanian minority create another Albanian state on Serbia’s territory.”

“When the UN Security Council rejects the proposal, there will be room for a new negotiating process with a new international mediator,” Lončar said.


Reactions to unveiling of Kosovo plan

27 March 2007 | 11:51 -> 13:24 | Source: B92, Beta, AP 
PRIŠTINA -- Kosovo Serbs should accept U.N. proposal to grant the province independence from Serbia, Kosovo prime minister says.

Fatmir Sejdiu (FoNet)In an interview with the Associated Press, Kosovo prime minister Agim Ceku said he was "intent on getting Kosovo's remaining 100,000 Serbs to accept the U.N. plan and end a boycott of public institutions."

“Kosovo's minority Serbs, who faced revenge attacks after the war and now live largely separate lives in isolated enclaves, should accept a U.N. proposal to grant the province eventual independence from Serbia,” Ceku explained.

He said the U.N. proposal offers Kosovo Serbs "the full guarantees" that their rights will be protected.

"They have all the necessary means to have a dignified and prosperous life in Kosovo together with all of us," Ceku said.

The Kosovo prime minister said Monday, upon the official unveiling of Ahtisaari’s plan that “supervised independence might not be an ideal solution, but it surely was the only realistic and viable option for Kosovo.”

Kosovo President Fatmir Sejdiu said on the same occasion Monday that the day the UN envoy Martti Ahtisaari recommended independence for Kosovo was of historical importance for the province.

"The fate of Kosovo is now in the hands of the UN Security Council," Sejdiu said.

He added he was pleased that "the comprehensive proposal to finally settle the status of Kosovo and grant independence to the province received the full support of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon."

“The independence of Kosovo, initially supervised by the international community, will benefit all of Kosovo’s citizens, including the Albanian majority and all minority communities that reside in Kosovo,” Sejdiu said.

He concluded that “an independent Kosovo would add to stability and peace in the region, as it is the last unresolved issue in South East Europe.”


Ahtisaari’s proposal directly opposes UN Charter

Belgrade, March 26, 2007, Belgrade Government – Serbian Minister of Public Administration and Local Self-Government Zoran Loncar said today that he is convinced the UN Security Council will reject the proposal of the UN Special Envoy for Kosovo-Metohija Martti Ahtisaari since it is directly opposed to the UN Charter.

In a statement to the Tanjug news agency, Loncar said that the proposal is in fact a plan which meets the interests of separatists which are to let the ethnic Albanian minority create another Albanian state on Serbia’s territory.

According to Loncar, when the UN Security Council rejects the proposal, there will be room for a new negotiating process with a new international mediator.

He stressed that the solution to the Kosovo issue must be in line with international law and the Serbian Constitution, adding his belief that new talks are the only right way leading to compromise and a lasting solution.

President of the Coordinating Centre for Kosovo-Metohija Sanda Raskovic-Ivic expressed belief that the proposal of Kosovo’s supervised independence, announced by US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns will not be adopted and that negotiations will resume.

Raskovic-Ivic commented Burns’ statement that the United States fully support Ahtisaari’s proposal on supervised independence by saying that in this way the United States support ethnic cleansing and the seizure of the territory of a sovereign, internationally recognised state, member and founder of the UN.

She pointed out that the United States backs the creation of another Albanian state in the Balkans on someone else’s territory, which would be built on the most brutal ethnic cleansing that started at the end of the 20th century and continues in the 21st century.

Raskovic-Ivic repeated that resuming the talks is the only way to find a compromise that would satisfy both sides.


Russia: Independence would damage stability

27 March 2007 | 12:03 | Source: B92, Interfax 
Moscow -- The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement Tuesday commenting on Ahtisaari’s finalized plan.

“The establishment of an independent state in Kosovo could have a negative impact on stability in Europe,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement, Interfax reported.

"The establishment of an independent state in Kosovo is fraught with serious complications for stability in Europe," the Foreign Ministry mantained.

"It is also doubtful whether Kosovo's independence, obtained without the consent of all countries, would facilitate the achievement of  the fundamental objectives that the status settlement requires, including the formation of a multiethnic society and the fulfillment of other standards," the Russian Foreign Ministry claimed. 


INTERNATIONAL MEDIA REPORTS


U.N. Report Urges Independence for Kosovo

By JULIA PRESTON
NEW YORK TIMES (USA)
March 27, 2007

Image:President Martti Ahtisaari 2004.jpgUNITED NATIONS, March 26 - Martti Ahtisaari, the United Nations secretary general's envoy for Kosovo, on Monday officially recommended its independence, saying it was the only way the strife-worn Serbian province could become economically viable and politically stable.

In a 61-page report submitted to the Security Council, Mr. Ahtisaari said he had concluded that negotiations between Serbia and Kosovo had reached an insurmountable impasse. He recommended that Kosovo's independence be supervised for "an initial period" by the European Union with NATO forces and European police officers.

Mr. Ahtisaari's proposals gave new momentum to Kosovo's drive for independence, United Nations diplomats said. But Serbian officials quickly rejected the plan, setting the stage for wrangling in the Security Council between the United States, which embraced the independence proposals, and Russia, another veto-bearing Council member that reaffirmed its support for Serbia.

During thirteen months of negotiations, Mr. Ahtisaari wrote, "both parties have reaffirmed their categorical, diametrically opposed positions," and any possibility for an agreement had been "exhausted." After Belgrade unleashed a campaign of attacks against Kosovo's ethnic Albanians, who make up more than 90 percent of the population, NATO forces intervened with aerial bombing in 1999 to stop the Serb offensive. Since then, Kosovo has been administered by the United Nations.

Mr. Ahtisaari said Kosovo would not accept a return of Serbian rule. "This is a reality one cannot deny; it is irreversible," he wrote.

The envoy's proposal calls for Kosovo to become a democratic, "multiethnic society." He called for a decentralized government in which Kosovar Serbs would have "a high degree of control" over their affairs.

Assistant Secretary of State Daniel Fried said in an interview that the United States was preparing for tough negotiations with Moscow. Washington will stress that Kosovo is a "unique case" that has long been under United Nations governance, American officials said, and its independence would not set any precedents for restive provinces in other countries, including Russia.


Russia to launch probe if Ahtisaari Kosovo plan accepted

RUSSIAN INFORMATION AGENCY NOVOSTI
27/03/2007

MOSCOW, March 27 (RIA Novosti) - Russia will demand inquiries into the implementation of all previous UN resolutions on Kosovo if the UN Security Council approves a UN special envoy's plan on the status of Kosovo, the Russian foreign minister said Tuesday.

Marti Ahtisaari, a special UN envoy for talks on Kosovo, has proposed that the province be granted internationally supervised sovereignty, but Serbian authorities have strongly opposed the plan as threatening Serbia's national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

"We will be checking how existing UN Security Council resolutions on Kosovo, particularly Resolution 1244, are being implemented," Sergei Lavrov said.

"We want to objectively, without imposing any one-sided evaluations, determine who was implementing UN Security Council resolutions and how, and who was not."

On Monday Ahtisaari returned his proposals on the future status of the breakaway Serbian province to the UN Security Council following fruitless top-level talks in Vienna between Pristina, Belgrade and the European Union, which said later in a statement that it fully backed Ahtisaari's plan.

As a veto-wielding member in the 15-nation UN Security Council and a traditional ally of Serbia, Russia has insisted that a decision on Kosovo should satisfy both Kosovar and Serbian authorities, and that it must be reached through negotiations.

Serbia's predominantly ethnic Albanian Kosovo province, which has a population of two million, has been a UN protectorate since NATO's 78-day bombing campaign against the former Yugoslavia ended a war between Serb forces and Albanian separatists in 1999.

The Serbian parliament unanimously approved a resolution February 14 rejecting some provisions of the plan.

Unlike Russia, NATO has made it clear that it favors independence for Kosovo, but a final decision will be up to the UN Security Council.

In its foreign policy review, published Tuesday, the Russian Foreign Ministry said that the lack of an alternative to the proposed independence for Kosovo could strain the international community's efforts to resolve the issue as a whole.

"The formation of an independent state of Kosovo could result in serious complications for stability in Europe," the ministry said. "It is doubtful that an independent Kosovo that does not enjoy the consent of all the countries involved will resolve the fundamental tasks at hand, such as the formation of a multi-ethnical society and the implementation of other standards for Kosovo."

Russia has been opposed to the internationally backed plan to grant sovereignty to Kosovo, also arguing that it would set a precedent for the breakaway regions in the former Soviet Union it is believed to support - Georgia's Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and Moldova's Transdnestr.


Kosovo's prime minister urges Serb minority to accept U.N. plan

Associated Press: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 5:34 AM

PRISTINA, Serbia-Kosovo's minority Serbs, who faced revenge attacks after the war and now live largely separate lives in isolated enclaves, should accept a U.N. proposal to grant the province eventual independence from Serbia, Kosovo's prime minister said Tuesday.

The plan, drafted by U.N. envoy Martti Ahtisaari, does not explicitly mention the word "independence." But in an introductory report delivered with his proposal to the U.N. Security Council on Monday, he clearly stated for the first time in an official document his belief that "the only viable option for Kosovo is independence, to be supervised for an initial period by the international community."

Serbia, which wants the province to remain within its borders, called that unacceptable and held out hope for more negotiations. The Security Council will make a final decision.

The territory's ethnic Albanian prime minister, Agim Ceku, meanwhile, was preparing for more meetings on the issue with other members of his government later Tuesday.

Ceku said he was intent on getting Kosovo's remaining 100,000 Serbs to accept the U.N. plan and end a boycott of public institutions.

Serbs "are very welcome in our society, they are very welcome to build together the future and I'm also inviting them to accept the hand, to accept this proposal and to accept to build together the future of Kosovo," Ceku told The Associated Press in brief remarks in his office.

He said the U.N. proposal offers Kosovo's Serbs "the full guarantees" that their rights will be protected.

"They have all the necessary means to have a dignified and prosperous life in Kosovo together with all of us," Ceku said.

After the war, Kosovo's Serb minority was targeted in revenge attacks and about 200,000 of them fled or were forced to flee the province.

In the 3 1/2-page report accompanying his proposal, Ahtisaari noted that the Serb community continued to face difficult living conditions. He said some international intervention is still needed because Kosovo, on its own, has a limited ability to protect minorities, develop democratic institutions and spur economic recovery and social reconciliation.

His recommendations were welcomed by Kosovo's ethnic Albanians, who make up 90 percent of province's 2 million people and have been pressing for independence for nearly two decades.

Kosovo has been administered by the United Nations since 1999, when NATO airstrikes ended a Serbian crackdown on ethnic Albanian separatists.

The U.N. plan is an attempt to resolve the final major dispute remaining from Yugoslavia's bloody breakup in the 1990s.

In his initial proposal, Ahtisaari did not use the word "independence," but stated that he would make his position clear when the plan is submitted to the Security Council. That plan grants the province its own constitution, flag, anthem and army, as well as rights to minority Serbs to run their daily affairs.

Ahtissari's plan faces an uncertain future in the Security Council, which is split on the issue. Russia supports Serbia and has implied it could use its veto power in the council if Belgrade's interests are not addressed. The United States and the European Union back the U.N. plan.

Diplomats at U.N. said the council would likely have its first formal discussion of the report April 3.


Serbia convinced Russia will veto Kosovo plan

Reuters, March 27

Serbia is convinced Russia will knock down a plan giving supervised independence to the breakaway Kosovo province with a "historic veto" at the U.N. Security Council, Serbia's prime minister said on Tuesday.

"We are convinced the proposal will fail in the Security Council and that will open a door to a new negotiation process with a new mediator," Vojislav Kostunica said in a statement.
United Nations envoy Martti Ahtisaari delivered the proposal to the Security Council on Monday after a year of talks between Belgrade and leaders of Kosovo's ethnic Albanian majority.

The United States and European Union have backed the plan, which would hand Kosovo independence under an EU overseer, eight years after a NATO bombing campaign drove the forces of late autocrat Slobodan Milosevic from the territory.

"A Russian veto in the Security Council on the Ahtisaari plan to carve up Serbia, to arbitrarily redraw our state borders, and a Russian veto on the brutal seizure of 15 percent of Serbian territory is... of historic significance for Serbia and the Serbian people," Kostunica said.

Washington and Brussels have warned of unrest if Albanians are denied independence or forced to wait much longer. They want a resolution endorsing the plan by summer.
Veto holder Russia has given mixed signals as to whether it will block the plan and has called for talks to continue. It says a solution acceptable to both Albanians and Serbs -- something Western analysts say is impossible -- must be found.

The Kosovo Albanians are also trying to "get through" to Russia, said Skender Hyseni, spokesman for Kosovo's negotiators.

"The aim is to convince the Russians to join the group of countries which has already accepted the plan," Hyseni said. "The feeling in New York is that Kosovo should be resolved as soon as possible. We cannot say when our patience will end."

Ten thousand Albanians died and almost one million fled during Serbia's 1998-99 counter-insurgency war against Albanian separatist guerrillas. Serbia says it would never accept the amputation of what it calls its cultural heartland.

But Serb media have floated the idea of partitioning the province along the river Ibar, which separates the mainly Albanian south from a northern corner that is home to just under half of Kosovo's 100,000 remaining Serbs.

Tens of thousands of Serbs fled revenge attacks with the end of the war and the deployment of a NATO peacekeeping force, which currently numbers 16,500 soldiers. Serbs who stayed on complain of discrimination, harassment and violence.

"It is more probable that Serbia accepts partition of the province than supervised independence," wrote top-selling daily Blic on Tuesday.

"The international community sees partition as more dangerous than independence, but even diplomats in Kosovo know partition is an option dictated by the situation on the ground."


US and EU back Kosovo independence by May

EU OBSERVER (BELGIUM)
26.03.2007 - 17:39 CET | By Andrew Rettman

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - The US and EU have backed a UN plan for "supervised independence" in Kosovo despite Russian and Serb opposition, with US diplomat Nicholas Burns in Brussels calling for a new UN security council resolution 30 to 60 days from Monday (26 March).

"The US fully supports the proposals put forward by Martti Ahtisaari," the US' number three man on foreign affairs told experts at a seminar by think-tank CEPS in the EU capital, a few hours before UN envoy Martti Ahtisaari submitted his Kosovo blueprint to UN chief Ban Ki Moon in New York.

"It's time to bring a century of peace to the Balkans, to see Kosovo independent and to see a democratic and strong Serbia," the American said, with UK foreign secretary Margaret Beckett adding shortly afterward from London she "welcomes UN special envoy Martti Ahtisaari's final settlement proposals."

The Ahtisaari plan envisages giving Pristina its own army, flag and constitution and the possibility of applying to join international institutions like the UN and EU, but with thousands of NATO and EU troops keeping the peace and an EU envoy that can veto some Kosovo government decisions.

"Independence is the only viable option for a politically stable and economically viable Kosovo," Mr Ahtisaari's final recommendation stated, Reuters reports, in a bold, new tone after months of negotiations in Vienna, Belgrade and Pristina that avoided using the painful word "independence."

Speaking to press the same day, EU top diplomat Javier Solana still remained shy of the term, opting to use the phrase "the work of president Ahtisaari" instead while expressing his support for the ex-Finnish president's ideas.

In terms of a timetable for the solution, the US' Mr Burns said "we're not going to rush to a security council resolution" mentioning "late April or early May" and "30 to 60 days" down the line as targets to get all five veto-holding powers in the UN - the US, UK, France, Russia and China - on board.

The biggest EU foreign policy players back the US line, but some EU states such as Spain, Greece, Romania, Slovakia and Cyprus sympathise with Belgrade. Serbia has denounced the Ahtisaari plan and Russia has threatened to veto anything unacceptable to its historic ally. China has been silent so far.

Mr Burns' statement kicks off a heavy week of Kosovo diplomacy, with the US talking to NATO states in Brussels on Kosovo for the next two days, Mr Ahtisaari briefing EU ambassadors on Tuesday and EU foreign ministers devoting a Friday meeting to the topic.

Almost exactly 8 years ago on 24 March 1999 NATO began a bombing campaign in Kosovo designed to halt what Mr Burns called Serbian "ethnic cleansing"

against the ethnic Albanians who form 93 percent of the population. The Serb province has been under UN rule ever since.

Kosovo is US and EU's top priority

The US diplomat said the task of EU and US foreign policy today is to "produce peace and stability in the world" adding "our first priority is to be successful in the Balkans, to complete the revolution that has taken place there since the 1990s."

In terms of handling Serb objections to the move, Mr Burns said he planned to call moderate Serb president Boris Tadic this week to explain "we are a friend to Serbia" and guarantee US protection for ethnic Serb enclaves and holy sites in the region.

The EU approach is similar, with Brussels offering to unfreeze Belgrade's EU accession talks despite lack of full cooperation with the UN on war crimes fugitives and with the new EU envoy in Kosovo to focus on keeping ethnic Serbs safe.

The US and EU are also reading from the same page on how to handle Russia, praising Moscow for its help on international problems like Iran and North Korea but scotching Russian talk of Kosovo independence as a precedent for rebels in Georgia or Moldova.

"Our second task [in terms of EU-US foreign policy priorities] is to have good relations with Russia," Mr Burns said. "[But] we certainly would not support any other trade, or precedent that would link Kosovo to other problems in Europe."

The American went a bit further than most European diplomats might dare, saying those countries who "made the biggest sacrifice" in terms of Kosovo military intervention and post-conflict aid - NATO and EU states - should take the lead in the region.

Iraq legacy dogs US

In an aside on recent Russian complaints the US has a "unipolar" world view, Mr Burns said assertively "My country finds itself the most powerful country economically and militarily...we have a lot of power, but we want to use that power for good, peacefully."

It was left to CEPS expert and ex-EU ambassador to Russia, Michael Emerson, to remind Mr Burns that when Bush junior became US president in 2002, he said "the US doesn't need allies" before wading into Iraq.

The Iraq adventure - which has seen over 600,000 civilians killed since

2003 - caused a serious rift between the US and France and Germany, with many ordinary left-leaning Europeans suddenly seeing the US with new, post-Cold War eyes as an oil-hungry imperialist not a force for good.

"Many senior analysts say the [US] language may change a bit, but the fundamentals remain obstinately constant," Mr Emerson suggested.

"I think there's a bipartisan consensus in my country - and I'm a career diplomat not a Republican or a Democrat - there's a consensus that America cannot live in the world alone," Mr Burns replied. "There's a great distance between those statements and the reality today."


Proposals for Kosovo's Final Status

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Press Statement
Tom Casey, Deputy Spokesman

Washington, DC, March 26, 2007

After over a year of negotiations, UN Special Envoy and former President of Finland Martti Ahtisaari has delivered to the UN Secretary General his proposals for Kosovo's future status. We are grateful to President Ahtisaari for his patient, skillful and balanced work leading the Kosovo status process.

The United States welcomes and supports his recommendations.

The UN Special Envoy's proposals will give the people of Kosovo clarity about their future for the first time in many years. They contain far-reaching guarantees to protect the rights and security of Kosovo Serbs and other non-Albanian communities. President Ahtisaari has also proposed that Kosovo become independent, subject to a period of international supervision.

The Kosovo status process is entering its final and decisive phase. As the UN Security Council prepares to review President Ahtisaari's recommendations, we will be engaged in full and intensive consultations with our Security Council partners and the parties.

The resolution of Kosovo's status should be seen in the historical context of the tragic circumstances of the break-up of Yugoslavia, which began in the 1990s. The UN Security Council, which in 1999 passed a resolution that placed Kosovo under UN administration and envisioned a political process to determine status, has long treated Kosovo as a special case.

Since the crisis in this region began sixteen years ago, President George W.

Bush and his two predecessors have worked to realize a vision of a Europe, whole, free and at peace. We believe that President Ahtisaari's proposals will allow the region to move beyond the conflicts of the 1990s and towards a brighter Euro-Atlantic future.


UN Proposal Recommends Independence for Kosovo

By Peter Heinlein United Nations

VOICE OF AMERICA (USA)
26 March 2007

The U.N. mediator for Kosovo has recommended independence for the breakaway Serbian province. From U.N. headquarters, correspondent Peter Heinlein reports Serbian officials called the decision "unacceptable".

In a long-awaited report to the U.N. Security Council, Special envoy Martti Ahtisaari says "independence is the only viable option for a politically stable and economically viable Kosovo."

At the same time, Ahtisaari says the region is not yet ready to tackle challenges such as protection of minorities, economic development, and social reconciliation.

He recommends an international civilian and military presence be maintained in the region for an unspecified 'initial period', until Kosovo has the capacity to stand on its own.

Kosovo's 90 percent ethnic-Albanian majority hailed the decision, but Serbian President Boris Tadic Monday called any form of independence for Kosovo "unacceptable". He said Serbia remains ready to 'constructively engage' in further talks on the province's future.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is in the Middle East, but spokesperson Marie Okabe says he accepts Ahtisaari's concept of 'supervised independence.'

"The Security Council has been presented with a plan which the secretary-general believes contains all of the right elements for fair and sustainable solution to Kosovo's future status," she said.

U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns was in Brussels when the report was released. He expressed Washington's full support for Ahtisaari's conclusions.

Burns explained 'supervised independence' as a means to provide Kosovo a 'way forward' toward independence, while ensuring the rights of the region's ethnic-Serb minority.

"The European Union would provide economic assistance for a period of time, NATO troops would continue to provide security and that there would be provisions for security for the Serb population for its churches, for its monasteries and for the people themselves, but that we have to get on and see that Kosovo become an independent state," he said. "And the United States supports that process."

Burns said he thinks the U.N. Security Council could pass a resolution confirming Kosovo's future status either in April or May.

Agreement in the Council is complicated by veto-wielding Russia's insistence that any Kosovo solution be acceptable to both sides. Ahtisaari has said he reached his recommendation for independence only after determining that the two sides were so far apart that a mutually acceptable solution was impossible.

Nevertheless, Burns remains optimistic. He told reporters he expects five to seven weeks of consultations to find the best way forward before the Security Council votes.

Kosovo has been under U.N. administration since 1999, after a three-month NATO bombing campaign drove Serb forces from the former Yugoslavia out of the province, ending a deadly Serb crackdown on ethnic Albanians.

The Ahtisaari plan sets the stage for eventual full independence for the region, including provisions for a constitution, a flag, an army, and guarantees that minority Serbs would be allowed to run their own affairs.

The plan also gives Kosovo the right to join international organizations reserved for sovereign states.


Russia says too soon to indicate Kosovo vote

MOSCOW, March 27, 2007 (AFP) - Veto-wielding Russia refused Tuesday to reveal how it would vote on a UN resolution recommending independence for the Serbian province of Kosovo, while reiterating its firm opposition to the plan.

"I think it's premature to say who is going to vote and how," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said here after meeting his Montenegrin counterpart, Milan Rocen.

UN mediator Martti Ahtisaari on Monday recommended supervised independence for Kosovo as the only option for the breakaway ethnic-Albanian majority province.

His plan has been welcomed by Kosovo Albanians but close Russian ally Serbia, which sees the tiny Balkan territory as the cradle of its religion and culture, has angrily rejected the proposal and called for more dialogue.

Kosovo Albanians make up 90 percent of the province's population of two million.
The United Nations has administered the Serbian province since 1999, after a NATO bombing campaign helped to drive out Serb forces carrying out a brutal crackdown on ethnic Albanian separatist guerrillas and their supporters.

Some 10,000 ethnic Albanians died and hundreds of thousands fled Kosovo during the 1998-1999 conflict. Thousands of Serbs have fled the province since it became a UN protectorate, due to reprisal attacks from ethnic Albanians.

Ahtisaari's plan is to be debated next month by the Security Council, which must approve Kosovo's future status.

The German presidency of the European Union, the United States and Britain threw their support behind the independence plan.

But Russia has implicitly threatened to use its veto power.

"The creation of an independent state of Kosovo will impose severe and serious complications on the stability of Europe," the foreign ministry said in a statement Tuesday.
Lavrov added: "Like (Serbia's neighbour) Montenegro, Russia believes that all regional problems must be resolved by taking into account the interests of the national peoples who populate the region.

"We will support any solution which would be acceptable for Belgrade and Pristina," he said, referring to the Serbian and Kosovo capitals.

More than 13 months of UN-sponsored talks between Serbian and Kosovo Albanian officials have failed to bring the two sides any closer to compromise, leading Ahtisaari to conclude that the time had come for the UN to decide.

Lavrov has earlier suggested that if Ahtisaari "has exhausted his resources, we can surely find someone else to handle this issue." Other Russian officials have said Moscow would like to see Ahtisaari replaced.

In his report issued Monday, Ahtisaari made it clear that in the initial phase international supervision of an independent Kosovo would be required.


EU fully backs Ahtisaari plan on status of Kosovo - statement

RUSSIAN INFORMATION AGENCY NOVOSTI
26/03/2007 21:55

BERLIN, March 26 (RIA Novosti) - The European Union fully supports a plan on the future status of Kosovo prepared by a special UN envoy and submitted to the UN Security Council Monday, the EU said in a statement.

Marti Ahtisaari, a special UN envoy for talks on Kosovo, said March 10 he would return his resolution proposals to the UN Security Council following fruitless top-level talks in Vienna between Pristina and Belgrade.

Ahtisaari has proposed that the Kosovo province be granted internationally supervised sovereignty, but Serbian authorities have strongly opposed his plan as threatening Serbia's national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

The Serbian parliament unanimously approved a resolution February 14 rejecting some provisions of the plan.

Serbia's predominantly ethnic Albanian Kosovo province, which has a population of two million, has been a UN protectorate since NATO's 78-day bombing campaign against the former Yugoslavia ended a war between Serb forces and Albanian separatists in 1999.

As a veto-wielding member in the 15-nation UN Security Council and a traditional ally of Serbia, Russia has insisted that a decision on Kosovo should satisfy both Kosovar and Serbian authorities, and that it must be reached through negotiations.

Unlike Russia, NATO has made it clear that it favors independence for Kosovo, but the final decision will be up to the UN Security Council.


Russia for resumption of diplomatic talks over Kosovo - Kamynin

ITAR-TASS (RUSSIAN FEDERATION) 26.03.2007, 14.44

MOSCOW, March 26 (Itar-Tass) -- Russia's position on the issue of a settlement in Kosovo remains unchanged, Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin told Itar-Tass. The UN Secretary General's special envoy, Martti Ahtisaari, is due to present his settlement plan to the UN Security Council later on Monday.

"We are for continuing the process of diplomatic negotiations over Kosovo with the aim of finding a compromise option," the diplomat said. "No artificial solution of the problem will be possible."

The UN Security Council will first examine the Ahtisaari plan. Specific proposals by the parties concerned will be made later, after the SC discusses the special envoy's proposal next month.

The Ahtsaari plan envisages wide sovereignty for the Serbian territory of Kosovo under international control and the auspices of the European Union, the possibility of its membership of international organizations and the adoption of its own constitution.

Russia has repeatedly pointed to the need for continuing the negotiating process. It also believes that Ahtisaari may be replaced by another envoy, if he fails to achieve more. Moscow believes it would be too early to plug the UN Security Council into solving the Kosovo problem now and will be prepared to support a solution that would suit both sides.


Continued uncertainty about its status may destabilize the region, U.N. envoy reports

By Maggie Farley
LA Times
March 27, 2007


UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. mediator for Kosovo said Monday that independence was the "only viable option" for the ethnic Albanian province in Serbia, a recommendation that may set up a Security Council deadlock between Serbia's ally Russia and the West.
U.N. envoy Martti Ahtisaari, who tried for a year to broker an agreement between ethnic Albanians and Serbs, reported to the council that talks had proved fruitless and that continued uncertainty about Kosovo's status would be destabilizing for the province and the region. For eight years since its devastating civil war, the province has been governed by the United Nations, and neither full Serbian control nor autonomy within Serbia would be tenable, Ahtisaari's report says.

Kosovo's limbo status has left it unable to develop its economy, gain access to international finance or attract foreign investment, all of which has led to further political instability.

"Upon careful consideration of Kosovo's recent history, the realities of Kosovo today, and taking into account the negotiations with the parties, I have come to the conclusion that the only viable option for Kosovo is independence, to be supervised for an initial period by the international community," Ahtisaari wrote.

In the weeks before presenting the report, Ahtisaari had carefully avoided the word "independence," saying he would leave it to the Security Council to decide the next steps. But in his report, the former president of Finland strongly urged the council to endorse his recommendation for independence.

In a proposal for Kosovo's "status settlement," included with the report, he outlined a transition period with a European Union representative and the support of NATO troops and European police to ensure stability while Kosovo's leaders developed political and legal institutions. They would write their own constitution and hold democratic elections within nine months of completion of the terms of the settlement, the proposal says.

Provisions of the settlement address the fragile coexistence of ethnic Albanians, Serbs and other minorities in Kosovo, calling for a "multiethnic society" and guarantees for minority representation in the community and Kosovo Assembly. The official languages would be Albanian and Serbian; Turkish, Bosnian and Roma would also be recognized. The Kosovo Serb community would have a "high degree of control over its own affairs," the proposal says.

Ahtisaari tried to allay Russian and Chinese concerns that granting Kosovo independence would encourage separatist movements in multiethnic countries.

"Kosovo is a unique case that demands a unique solution," the report says. "It does not create a precedent for other unresolved conflicts."

The Security Council is to begin discussing the report April 3, diplomats said. The debate could be a long one. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei V. Lavrov has criticized Ahtisaari for giving up on negotiations and called for him to be replaced by someone more optimistic about the prospect of compromise.

Serbia's president, Boris Tadic, said independence for Kosovo in any form was "unacceptable." Kosovo President Fatmir Sejdiu welcomed the proposal as "a historic day for Kosovo" and said independence would help build "peace, stability and prosperity" in the province, according to an Associated Press report from its capital, Pristina.

The U.S. strongly backs independence for Kosovo, said R. Nicholas Burns, undersecretary of State for political affairs.

"Finally, after eight years, the people of Kosovo are going to know where their future lies and what their status shall be, and the United States does support the proposal, he said in Brussels.



Opening Pandora's Box in Kosovo

25 March 2007 | 13:59 | Source: B92, mn.ru 
Moscow -- No one understands just how deeply ingrained the problem of Kosovo is in the region, former Russian PM Yevgeny Primakov says.

Chairman of the Russian chamber of commerce and former Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov wrote in an op-ed published by the Moskovskie Novosti of his recent stay in Belgrade where he had informal, extensive talks with both President Boris Tadić and Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica and gained “some interesting insights.”

“My general impression from what I saw and heard is that no one, primarily in Washington, understands just how deeply ingrained the issue of Kosovo is in the minds of the Serbs,” Primakov wrote

He said that “some Western politicians may have hoped that President Tadic would put EU membership above Serbia's territorial integrity,” which did not happen as” both Kostunica and Tadic categorically rejected independence for Kosovo.”

Primakov gave detailes of his talks to Tadić and Koštunica who introduced him to the details of Belgrade’s stance over Kosovo, as he cited three main points in the position of the Serbian leadership

“First, a fundamental solution to the Kosovo problem should be based on the preservation of the province's de jure status as part of Serbia with maximum independence [autonomy] rights,” Primakov writes adding that “the second point meant that Serbia was not turning its back on the West.”

Primakov said that “According to Koštunica, the country's course toward integration into the EU is still on.

However, this course should not impede relations with Russia, as “according to Tadić, Serbia has three foreign policy priorities: rapprochement with the European Union, the United States, and Russia,” Primakov added.

He particularly stressed the third point, according to which “the Serbian leadership is striving to continue negotiations with the Kosovo Albanians, harmonize positions and achieve a compromise formula that would be acceptable to both sides.”

He went on to elaborate on his impressions from the  meetings with Serbia's top officials saying that “not all negotiating avenues have been exhausted yet.”

“I have often heard the question: Why act in such haste in dealing with this complex, long-standing problem? Unsurprisingly, many see "PR moves by the U.S. administration" behind this haste,” Primakov argued and explained:

“After leaving office, President Bush will go down in history not just with an "Iraq stigma" but also with victory in the Balkans, meaning that the air strikes on Belgrade eight years ago were not in vain,” Primakov wrote.

he commented on Richard Holbrooke's statement, predicting that delay in resolving the Kosovo issue would lead to more bloodshed.

"Should, God forbid, the scenario be played out, many questions are bound to arise: NATO forces and police have been deployed in Kosovo for the past eight years, therefore this entire international operation, initiated by the United States, has failed to establish stability in the province?" Primakov wondered.

He added that "if anti-Serb violence was possible even in the presence of international forces, what would be in store for the Serbian minority should Kosovo gain independence?"

At the end of his op-ed Primakov drew attention “to yet another problem,” saying that “once Kosovo is granted independence, the Bosnian state, created with so much difficulty, could start coming apart at the seams.”

“It cannot be ruled out that centrifugal trends will reemerge and start picking up pace. Bosnian Serbs could start gravitating toward Serbia, while a similar trend among Bosnian Croats with respect to Croatia could result in their secession from the Croatian-Muslim federation in Bosnia,” the former Russian prime minister concluded. 


KIM Info-service ARCHIVE
2004 Archives: | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
2005 Archives: | January | February | March | April | May | June | July| August September | October | November | December
2006 Archives:
| January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
2007 Archives: |
January| February | March

More News Available on our:
Kosovo Daily News list (KDN)
KDN Archive

Earlier Newsletters can be found at: http://www.kosovo.net/erpkiminfo.html 
Photo Galleries of the March pogrom are available at: http://www.kosovo.net/pogrom.html


Our Information Service is distributing news on Kosovo related issues. The main focus of the Info-Service is the life of the Serbian Orthodox Church and the Serbian community in the Province of Kosovo and Metohija.

Disclaimer:
The views expressed by the authors of newspaper articles or other texts which are not official communiqués or news reports by the KIM Info-Service are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Serbian Orthodox Church
.
Translations from local media, reflect personal opinions of individual authors, or opinions of organizations that released the text(s). Please contact the copyright holders for reprinting rights and objections. KIM Info-service is not responsible for accuracy of translated texts, except in case of its own statements and news.

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material.

Additional information on the Church and the life of the Kosovo Serb Community may be found at: http://www.kosovo.net

If you want to unsubscribe go to the page: http://www.kosovo.net/erpkiminfo.html

Copyright 2006, KIM Info-Service

Our mailing lists: in English in Serbian